The Year of the Prancing Horse — Ferrari’s place in F1 

Ferrari has always existed somewhere between legacy and expectation. It stands apart from other teams, carrying something heavier. For a sport in which success and failure are decided in milliseconds and then forgotten just as quickly, Ferrari is a name that is remembered in eras. The success, the failures, and everything in between carry a weight that no other name in Formula 1 seems to be able to match. 

  

There was an age at Ferrari where it did not only compete, but it defined what it meant to win. The early 2000s, under the excellence of Michael Schumacher, seemed almost preordained. The championships accumulated one after the other, the car and the driver seemingly constructed from the same blueprint. It was excellence refined to the point of routine. Winning became expected, not celebrated. And perhaps that is where the story begins to turn — because in Formula 1, nothing stays certain for long. 

 

What followed has been far less straightforward. Ferrari did not disappear, but it stopped being untouchable. The years blended into one another: moments of pace, tactical mistakes, and reliability problems. The team became something unusual — not unsuccessful, but not quite successful either. It turned into a punchline at times, the subject of jokes about strategy calls and missed opportunities. The gap between what Ferrari was and what it had become only made it more noticeable. 

 

Ferrari’s identity, though, has never really been about results alone. Enzo Ferrari once said, “Ask a child to draw a car, and certainly he will draw it red.” It sounds simple, almost throwaway, but it explains more than any statistic ever could. Ferrari is not just successful — it is instinctive. It is the version of Formula 1 that people imagine before they understand it. 

 

That idea has been echoed by those who have driven for it too. Sebastian Vettel put it more directly: “Everyone is a Ferrari fan. Even if they say they’re not, they are Ferrari fans.” There is something about Ferrari that goes beyond allegiance. Even in its worst moments, it remains central to the sport itself. 

 

And yet, that expectation never left. If anything, it grew. Ferrari is not judged like other teams. A podium is not enough. A win is not enough. It is measured against its own history, against a standard set decades ago. That is what makes every improvement feel significant, and every mistake feel amplified. 

 

Now, there is something different. Not certainty, it is far too early for that, but something closer to belief. 

 

The image of Lewis Hamilton finally standing on the podium in red is one of those moments that is bigger than the result itself. It is not about the points or the position; but rather about what it represents. A driver who has already defined an era of the sport choosing to end his career at Ferrari says something about where the team is, or at least where it could be. 

 

Being second in the championship this early in the season does not guarantee anything. Formula 1 has a way of correcting optimism very quickly. But Ferrari fans are not known for caution. After years of near-success and almost-there seasons, even a small shift feels like something worth holding onto. It is not blind hope, but it is persistent. The kind that refuses to let go, even when it probably should. 

 

There is also something fitting about this moment happening now. Ferrari has spent years trying to balance its identity — the weight of its history with the demands of a sport that is constantly changing. The modern Formula 1 grid is faster, more technical, more precise than ever before. Success is no longer built on legacy alone. It requires adaptation, consistency, and a willingness to move forward without losing what made you significant in the first place. 

 

Ferrari seems, at least for now, to be attempting exactly that. Not by rewriting its identity, but by refining it. The car looks competitive. The decisions, while not perfect, feel sharper. There is a sense of structure that has been missing for a while. It might not be dominance, but it is direction. 

 

Of course, Formula 1 does not reward potential. It rewards execution. Seasons are long, and narratives change quickly. A strong start can fade just as easily as it appeared. The difference between a title fight and another year of “what if” is often a handful of races, a few key decisions, or a single upgrade that works — or doesn’t. 

 

That is what makes this moment so uncertain, and so interesting. Ferrari is not back — not yet. But it is close enough for people to start asking the question again. 

 

“The Year of the Horse” might not end with a championship. It might not even come close. But for the first time in a while, Ferrari does not just feel like a story of the past. It feels like something still being written. 

 

For a team that has spent so long chasing its own history, that might be the most important shift of all. 

 

Liza Arshad 

 

Sources- 

 

 

The Campus Collective

Your King Ed’s Newspaper!

Previous
Previous

She’s “Off with her head”: Alice’s ‘trip’ into Wonderland  

Next
Next

An Inheritance of Uncertainty: The Consequences of Climate Change